Our most difficult problem in discussing consciousness, thoughts, memory, and learning is that we do not know the neural mechanisms of thought, and we know little about the mechanisms of memory. We know that the destruction of large portions of the cerebral cortex does not prevent a person from having thoughts, but it does reduce the depth of the thoughts and also the degree of awareness of the surroundings. Each thought certainly involves simultaneous signals in many portions of the cerebral cortex, thalamus, limbic system, and reticular formation of the brain stem. Some basic thoughts probably depend almost entirely on lower centers; the thought of pain is probably a good example because electrical stimulation of the human cortex seldom elicits anything more than mild pain, whereas stimulation of certain areas of the hypothalamus, amygdala, and mesencephalon can cause excruciating pain. Conversely, a type of thought pattern that does require large involvement of the cerebral cortex is that of vision, because the loss of the visual cortex causes complete inability to perceive visual form or color. We might formulate a provisional definition of thought in terms of neural activity as follows: A thought results from a “pattern” of stimulation of many parts of the nervous system at the same time, probably involving most importantly the cerebral cortex, thalamus, limbic system, and upper reticular formation of the brain stem. This theory is called the holistic theory of thoughts. The stimulated areas of the limbic system, thalamus, and reticular formation are believed to determine the general nature of the thought, giving it such qualities as pleasure, displeasure, pain, comfort, crude modalities of sensation, localization to gross areas of the body, and other general characteristics. However, specific stimulated areas of the cerebral cortex determine discrete characteristics of the thought, such as (1) specific localization of sensations on the surface of the body and objects in the fields of vision, (2) the feeling of the texture of silk, (3) visual recognition of the rectangular pattern of a concrete block wall, and (4) other individual characteristics that enter into one’s overall awareness of a particular instant. Consciousness can perhaps be described as our continuing stream of awareness of either our surroundings or our sequential thoughts.
top of page
bottom of page
Thank you very much for that citation, @Daniel Sumner. That's a very interesting consideration on thoughts, memory, and consciousness, @Affra Iftikhar, but it's always best to cite where information comes from! Authors work hard on their material and we want to ensure they are given due credit and that whoever reads this can find additional information in the source material if they choose.
Hi,
A very interesting post - but I would suggest posting the link where you gathered this information from. The paragraph is an almost verbatim copy of 'Guyton & Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology' page 862.
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=J_HQDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA697&pg=PA862#v=onepage&q&f=false
I'm sure this was meant to be an informative post which it was, and very interesting too, but it's good practice to post the link so that others may read the same material straight from the source.
Thanks again for sharing a thought-provoking excerpt.
Wow, that was quite the post! I really enjoyed reading that and it has given me some food for thought. You have an impressive knowledge. I like that last sentence in particular, "Consciousness can perhaps be described as our continuing stream of awareness of either our surroundings or our sequential thoughts."