I know this is a bit dated, but I'm wondering what everyone's thoughts are on this movement, or conservatorship in general? Conservatorship is getting a bad rap in the news and media lately (did anyone else see 'I Care a Lot'?), but I'm sure there are cases in which it is appropriate.
top of page
bottom of page
I should probably be ashamed, but I have not seen the documentary although I know a lot of people were very interested in it. I read in some articles that she had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, but it was unclear whether this was truly diagnosed. It is hard to take some things in the media at face value. As for conservatorship in general, I have done evaluations for this purpose. I agree that it has been getting a bad rap in the news lately, but I believe it is an extremely important tool. In fact, the concept of conservatorship existed even as early as the ancient Roman empire. Most of the individuals I have evaluated for this purpose were intellectually disabled or had a form of dementia (e.g., Alzheimer's). For such individuals, having a person who can care for their estate, health decisions, etc. is essential in many cases.
I want you to consider the social model of disability. Also, I don't know what was her certain disorders but as I understand she was diagnosed with some mental disorders which can be accepted under the term disability as an intellectual disability. Actually, living independently does not mean not getting any help. Anyone can need help, even people may seek aid for certain tasks. The important point thing is not to impose anything on the person with a disability and not to set rules without considering the requests and needs of the person. I don't support that she needed 13 years of guardship. After she was found a disabled person, there were strict rules for her. Basically, her freedom was extremely limited so she couldn’t make decisions by herself. She obeyed take permission of her legal guardian for many things. For instance, she was not able to manage her financial situation as she would. Even she had to express her request for getting married.
Conservatorship can be a good thing but in Britney’s case, I don’t think that was what she needed. She needed help but not that kind of help. People around her just used that as an opportunity to steal from her and she couldn’t really do anything about it because that power was taken from her.
While conservatorship could be a good thing, it could also be an inappropriate intervention in certain situations (such as that of Britney).
Marisa, that's a great topic. I briefly followed the case and I know that she's been released from conservatorship. Did they ever formally diagnose Britney with a mental illness?